How does SS1 and SS2 differ in regards to a suitelet being called in an iframe in a Site Builder page? In SS1 the iframe renders, in SS2 it returns 'You must log in to access this page". Both suitelets have Available without login unchecked.

I would assume that they should work in similar manner.

Call me crazy... but does the Suitlet's script file also have 'Available without Login' checked?

Checked or unchecked, it made no difference. The SL loads up a html file from the cabinet and that is displayed in an inline html field, SS1 works, SS2 gives the login

And I'm assuming the HTML file also has 'Available without Login' checked?

I tried that as well. With SS1 it's not required

Hmmm, yeah I'm stumped. And you're using the external URL of the suitelet? (Sorry for all of the 'is your computer turned on?' questions!)

All good, I appreciate it. In SS2 I tried both, but in SS1 I don't think one can make the distinction

Yeah, the External URL comes off the script deployment record when you choose 'available without login' there. Another thought... do you have any role/employee restrictions on the script deployment audience tab?

No, All Roles is checked. I did get it to load with some set of settings, however, the client scripts call a restlet (same account) and I was getting the Invalid Login Attempt with SS2. With SS1, no issues. Just, odd

Yeah, is odd. Kinda would expect that in 1.0 you'd see the same issues... I always understood iFrames to be their "own world". So unless you're somehow passing a session cookie to the iFrame I'm surprised the client script in 1.0 recognizes the login. So yeah... set it and forget it. 😄

The real pain is using Site Builder lol

Amen to that! But I'm not sure SuiteCommerce Standard or Advanced are much better... problems of their own kinds!