Hello, how can I call a SL from a MR? I have tried :

var suiteletURL = url.resolveScript({
                                scriptId: 'scriptId',
                                deploymentId: 'deployId'
                                });
                            
                              var response = <http://https.post|https.post>({
                                url:suiteletURL,
                                body: params
                              });

This returned an invalid URL, then I added to the URL ->

url: 'https://' + domain + suiteletURL

where domain is

url.resolveDomain({ hostType: url.HostType.APPLICATION });

But this returned on the response a 500 error, then I tried with

redirect.toSuitelet()

but this apparently didnt do nothing. Any idea

https://netsuite.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/96933/kw/suitelet%20post does this help?

As an alternate solution , we can create a SuiteLet script that can trigger another Suitelet. 

Here is a code snippet used in creating a SuiteLet that would trigger another Suitelet:



 function onRequest(context) {

      var parameters='';

      var suiteletURL = url.resolveScript({

        scriptId:'customscript148',      // Script id of the script that will be triggered

        deploymentId: 'customdeploy1',

        returnExternalUrl: true

      });

      log.debug('suiteletURL', suiteletURL)

      var response1 = <http://https.post|https.post>({  //Sends and http post request 

        url: suiteletURL,

        body: parameters

      });

    } 

    return {

      onRequest: onRequest

    };

That's probably what you need to do, I'd try it with the returnExternalUrl as true

Thats what I was missing, returnExternalURL...

I don't think this will work from a MR -> Slt

I'm very curious why you would need to call a suitelet from an MR

@Shawn Talbert it did work with the external

Is it set as 'available without login'?

@Sandii working on a legacy solution, they left a module set up like that, is easier to make it work as it is, than redoing it

Ah OK. that explains it. Maybe not a good idea from a security perspective, but my point was authentication would not flow from MR -> Slt automatically.