<@U29JEQVL6> I've used it several times, but perha...
# sdf
s
@al3xicon I've used it several times, but perhaps with simpler constructs than you are trying. It seems to be using SDF basically under the hood.
a
yeah I knew that it was using SDF under the hood, unfortunately I haven't gotten it to work for me yet - but may have to do with the dependencies on the objects i'm dealing with being complex, like you mentioned
glad at least it works somewhat, but it sounds like hopefully it will work better in the next release
s
perhaps just use SDF directly?
a
i was thinking of doing that, it's been a while since i have...probably would still be better than just moving everything manually, eh?
s
more importantly, using 'real' SDF means you can version everything, which we should be doing pretty much without exception.
the exception being perhaps experiments that are known to be just throw-away, or when working with the various constructs that are not yet supported by SDF
a
that is a big plus for sure