Thinking exclusively about performance, is it generally better to have more workflows that do very specific things, or have fewer workflows that consolidate similar but distinct actions?

We have found that the fewer amount of workflows, the better the performance. We use to have for example like 6 different workflows running on one of our records. After we consolidated the workflows into like one or two of them, it sped things up a bit

Thanks so much!

and generally it's better to have scripts instead of workflows, because workflows are by necessity, a type of ugly script