Verónica
09/28/2026, 3:28 PMChristopher Quackenbush
09/28/2026, 3:48 PMKevin Eimer
09/28/2026, 3:55 PMehcanadian
09/28/2026, 4:46 PMACCOUNT_SPECIFIC_VALUE in objects, and not being able to specify a specific deploy.xml file to use.darrenhillconsulting
09/28/2026, 6:23 PMThanks for asking, @Verónica! I have two asks, both about the SuiteCloud CLI and CI/CD:
1. Let us point to a specificanddeploy.xml(auth ID) when we run a command, rather than having them read from fixed locations in the project. For example:project.json
suitecloud project:deploy --deploy-file deploy.qa.xml --project-config ci/project.qa.json
CI/CD: a single GitLab pipeline could deploy to different accounts, or deploy different sets of objects, by passing flags. Today we have to generate or swap files before each run. This is also a +1 to @ehcanadian.
Fewer accidental deploys to the wrong account: at the moment the target account is whateverlast pointed to. If developers had to name the account on the command line, deploying from a dev environment would be a deliberate choice, and nobody would push to the wrong account because of a stale default.project.json
2. SACC commands in the CLI. We'd like a much larger set of SuiteApp Control Center actions available from the command line, backed by the SACC REST API: upload a packaged version, release it to the Leading/Lagging phase, push-upgrade the install base, and deprecate. Our pipeline already builds, packages and tags each release. With these commands, it could take a SuiteApp all the way from merge to a released version in SACC.
(Checked against CLI 4.1.0:has noproject:deployor config-file option today. The target account is always whatever--authidsays, and none of the commands touch SACC.)project.json
Mike Robbins
09/29/2026, 2:31 PMcreece
09/29/2026, 4:31 PMMike Robbins
09/29/2026, 4:53 PMcreece
09/29/2026, 4:54 PMSRP-curious
09/30/2026, 1:05 PMChristopher Quackenbush
09/30/2026, 3:38 PMMike Robbins
09/30/2026, 3:38 PM