If you think it is that good, I will go over it again... thanks for the suggestion.

Had to do some things, but returned back to reading... at this point now

Or coffee replaced programmers. (Actually, remove coffee and see what happens. I dare you.)

and honestly, he has a point. The truth we don't want to admit. We are creatures that turns caffeine into bugs.

Although I agree with everything he said... it is a cycle, not revolution... and it is not about the code, but about intent. But I am kind of searching for a philosophical reason why... if we have a world model (what the purpose of every tool, and what every configuration means, and how everything in the stack connect to each other)... why that "world model" can't be mapped to a language model. How do we know that in a few years, they won't be able to put some kind of meaning in linguistic way, to every action you can make in every tool, or at least popular ones... JS, Java, etc.... mysql, postgres, etc... and map that to AI? And I am talking about a level higher than what exists now. I am searching for a philosophical argument... this is impossible because of (what?) After that, my mind will truly calm down.