Prashant Kala
07/13/2025, 9:41 AMCeligo AI
07/13/2025, 9:41 AMAI generated answer (using internal Slack threads):Based on the conversations, it seems that the fields
issueinventorynumber
, inventorynumber
, and receiptinventorynumber
are used differently in NetSuite SuiteScript depending on the context.
1. `issueinventorynumber`: This field is used for negative inventory adjustments, i.e., when the quantity of an item decreases. It is also used for serialized or lot numbered items. When creating a new item receipt, you can type a string and when you save it, it will create the serial/lot number record and associate it with the inventory detail. However, it seems that it expects an integer (internal id) of an existing serial/lot number when trying to overwrite the serial/lot number field on inventory detail subrecord of an item receipt on before load.
2. `inventorynumber`: This field is used to refer to lots/serial numbers. There is a difference between the internal id of a lot and the internal id of an item. If you are dealing with a lot numbered or serialized item, you need to fill in the inventory detail record.
3. `receiptinventorynumber`: This field is used for positive inventory adjustments, i.e., when the quantity of an item increases. For bin transfers, it's receiptinventorynumber
.
Please note that these fields are used in the context of inventory management in NetSuite and their usage might vary depending on the specific requirements of your SuiteScript.
******
Disclaimer:
This response was generated by an artificial intelligence assistant based on previous conversations from multiple Slack channels, and may contain inaccuracies or mistakes.
******Celigo AI
07/13/2025, 9:42 AMSlack thread 1: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.840503156
Slack thread 2: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.84017545
Slack thread 3: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.840160668
Celigo AI
07/13/2025, 9:42 AM