clientscript postsourcing vs fieldchanged

AI generated answer (using internal Slack threads):

In NetSuite, both

fieldChanged

and

postSourcing

are client script trigger types, but they are used in different scenarios and have different behaviors. The

fieldChanged

trigger is fired when a field is changed on the client side. This could be due to user interaction or a script changing the field value. It's important to note that

fieldChanged

is triggered after the field value has been changed and all sourcing has been completed. This trigger type is useful when you want to perform an action immediately after a field value has been changed. On the other hand, the

postSourcing

trigger is fired after a field is sourced from another record. This is typically used when you want to perform an action after a field has been populated from a source record. It's important to note that

postSourcing

is triggered after the field value has been sourced and all sourcing has been completed. In terms of performance, there is no definitive answer as it depends on the specific use case and the complexity of the script. However, it's worth noting that

fieldChanged

might be more efficient in some cases as it is triggered immediately after a field value has been changed, whereas

postSourcing

is triggered after all sourcing has been completed. Here is an example of how you might use these triggers in a client script:

javascript
function fieldChanged(context) {
    if (context.fieldId === 'custbody_my_custom_field') {
        // Perform some action
    }
}

function postSourcing(context) {
    if (context.fieldId === 'custbody_my_sourced_field') {
        // Perform some action
    }
}

Remember, the choice between

fieldChanged

and

postSourcing

will depend on your specific use case and the behavior you want to achieve. ****** Disclaimer: This response was generated by an artificial intelligence assistant based on previous conversations from multiple Slack channels, and may contain inaccuracies or mistakes. ******