what is disadvantage to call another map reduce script in map/reduce phase to process recursion data

AI generated answer (using internal Slack threads):

Calling another map/reduce script in the map/reduce phase to process recursion data can have several disadvantages: 1. Performance Impact: Each call to another map/reduce script will consume governance units. If the data set is large, this could lead to performance issues and potentially exceed the script's governance limit. 2. Complexity: Implementing recursion within a map/reduce script can increase the complexity of the code, making it harder to maintain and debug. 3. Data Consistency: If the data changes during the execution of the recursive map/reduce scripts, it could lead to inconsistencies in the processed data. 4. Governance Limit: Each map/reduce script has a governance limit of 10,000 units for the entire execution. If the recursive call to another map/reduce script is within the same execution context, it will count towards this limit, potentially causing the script to terminate prematurely if the limit is exceeded. 5. Queueing and Scheduling: Map/Reduce scripts are queued and scheduled by NetSuite, and there's no guarantee on when exactly they will run. If you're relying on the results of one script to feed into another, this could cause delays or issues with data processing. ****** Disclaimer: This response was generated by an artificial intelligence assistant based on previous conversations from multiple Slack channels, and may contain inaccuracies or mistakes. ******