does the due/to from subsidiary field matter if the eliminate checkbox has been unchecked for an advanced intercompany journal entry

AI generated answer (using internal Slack threads):

****** Disclaimer: This response was generated by an artificial intelligence assistant based on previous conversations from multiple Slack channels, and may contain inaccuracies or mistakes. ****** The due/to from subsidiary field does matter in an advanced intercompany journal entry, even if the eliminate checkbox has been unchecked. The due/to from subsidiary field is used to indicate the subsidiary with which the transaction is taking place. For example, if a US subsidiary sells to Canada, the AP account of the US subsidiary must indicate Canada in the to subsidiary field. If the eliminate checkbox is unchecked, it means that the transaction will not be considered for intercompany elimination. However, the due/to from subsidiary field still needs to be filled out correctly to ensure that the transaction is recorded accurately between the subsidiaries involved. In addition, the accounts that are used in the transaction must have the "Eliminate Intercompany Transactions" option checked in their settings. This is necessary to ensure that the transaction is properly recorded and can be eliminated if necessary. If you are encountering issues with this, it may be due to the customer not being set up for intercompany transactions. You can check this by looking at the "Represents Subsidiary" field on the customer record. If the customer is not set up for intercompany transactions, you may need to adjust their settings or use a different customer for the transaction.