record.submitFields({ type: context.newRecord.type, id: newRecord.id, values: { custentity_md_supplier_id_source: supplierIdAndName }, options: { enableSourcing: false, ignoreMandatoryFields: true } }); is this segment of code accurate?

AI generated answer (using internal Slack threads):

The provided code segment appears to be accurate. It uses the

record.submitFields

method to update a specific field (

custentity_md_supplier_id_source

) on a record of a certain type and id. The options

enableSourcing

and

ignoreMandatoryFields

are set to

false

and

true

respectively. Here is a brief explanation of the code: -

type: context.newRecord.type

specifies the type of the record to be updated. -

id: newRecord.id

specifies the id of the record to be updated. -

values: {custentity_md_supplier_id_source: supplierIdAndName}

specifies the field to be updated and the new value. -

options: {enableSourcing: false, ignoreMandatoryFields: true}

specifies additional options for the operation.

enableSourcing

set to

false

means that the system will not trigger sourcing and mandatory field validation will be ignored as

ignoreMandatoryFields

is set to

true

. However, please ensure that

context.newRecord.type

,

newRecord.id

, and

supplierIdAndName

are defined and have valid values in your script. Also, make sure that

custentity_md_supplier_id_source

is the correct API id of the field you want to update. ****** Disclaimer: This response was generated by an artificial intelligence assistant based on previous conversations from multiple Slack channels, and may contain inaccuracies or mistakes. ******