Nada Ahmed
10/16/2024, 8:11 AMCeligo AI
10/16/2024, 8:11 AMAI generated answer (using internal Slack threads):To show the Paired Intercompany Transaction field on a saved search, you can try using a formula field. However, it seems that the field returns the internal ID of the transaction rather than the transaction number. Unfortunately, it appears that the field is not a related field, so you can't use a join to get the document number. One workaround suggested in the threads is to use a formula field and return the field {intercotransaction}. However, this seems to return the same result as pulling the field directly. Another suggestion is to try using {intercotransaction.fieldname}, replacing 'fieldname' with the field you want. However, this also seems to result in a 'field not found' error because the field is not a related field. It was also suggested to try using {intercotransaction.id}, which seems to work, but it doesn't seem to pull in any other fields from the sales order. It's also worth noting that the 'To subsidiary' field does not return any results for intercompany entries in a saved search. The only way to get this field to return results is to turn on Centralized Purchasing and Billing, but this has other implications. ****** Disclaimer: This response was generated by an artificial intelligence assistant based on previous conversations from multiple Slack channels, and may contain inaccuracies or mistakes. ******
Celigo AI
10/16/2024, 8:11 AMSlack thread 1: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.830670118
Slack thread 2: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.826186478
Slack thread 3: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.821183383
Celigo AI
10/16/2024, 8:11 AM