In terms of perfomance, which is better to use setSublistValue(options) or inline html table?

AI generated answer (using internal Slack threads):

In terms of performance, using

setSublistValue(options)

is generally faster and more efficient than using an inline HTML table. This is because

setSublistValue(options)

directly interacts with the NetSuite backend, while an inline HTML table requires rendering and processing on the client side, which can slow down performance, especially with large data sets. However, it's important to note that the choice between

setSublistValue(options)

and an inline HTML table also depends on the specific use case and requirements. For instance, if you need to provide a user-friendly interface with editable fields, an inline HTML table might be a better choice despite the potential performance hit. In the context of a Map/Reduce script, the choice between

setSublistValue()

and

setCurrentSublistValue()

depends on how you are loading the record. If the

isDynamic

parameter is true, then you can use

record.selectLine()

,

record.setCurrentSublistValue()

, and

record.commitLine()

to mimic UI behavior. If

isDynamic

is false, then you have to use

setSublistValue()

. Remember, unless you need the dynamic mode to populate other fields, it's suggested to set

isDynamic

to false and use

setSublistValue()

. ****** Disclaimer: This response was generated by an artificial intelligence assistant based on previous conversations from multiple Slack channels, and may contain inaccuracies or mistakes. ******