the attach transaction is not visible on the lande...
# ask-stanley-ai
l
the attach transaction is not visible on the landed cost tab
c
AI generated answer (using internal Slack threads):
Based on the conversations, it seems that the issue of the attached transaction not being visible on the Landed Cost tab could be due to the type of item involved. In NetSuite, items with the item type of 'Other Charge for Purchase' do not have the option to track landed costs. This is because landed cost can only be tracked for Inventory Items within the system, as the landed cost recognized is applied to the asset account of the item where Landed Cost is being tracked. For Non-Inventory Items (including Other Charge for Purchase), this cannot be made since Non-Inventory Items do not have Asset accounts associated with them. As a workaround, one user suggested receiving the product into the factory location, and then transferring the products over to the actual warehouse, where the landed cost and tariff cost can be added to the transfer order. In another conversation, it was mentioned that to see how the costs have been adjusted due to the landed cost being included, you have to associate the vendor bill for which you received the landed costs to the item receipt under the "landed costs" tab. You have to create the appropriate landed cost categories, and associate to each line item on the bills before being able to associate bills to item receipts. ****** Disclaimer: This response was generated by an artificial intelligence assistant based on previous conversations from multiple Slack channels, and may contain inaccuracies or mistakes. ******
Slack thread 1: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.811991751
Slack thread 2: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.807657063
Slack thread 3: here (available only if the original thread was posted in the last 90 days)
Similarity score: 0.805456519
Please provide your feedback on this answer.