so far, i would still categorize the asynchronous server-side support as dangerous
battk
01/26/2021, 10:57 PM
it still doesnt do anything to handle rejected promises, unhandled rejected promises are ignored
battk
01/26/2021, 11:09 PM
2.1 debugger wise, im also kinda disappointed in it
it does not handle closures well
battk
01/26/2021, 11:13 PM
and while i havent tried it yet, i hope the new secrets can be used outside of secure strings or keys
Ive found secure strings bad enough at mixed content that i cant even implement basic authentication with it
battk
01/26/2021, 11:15 PM
closest i got with secure strings was to do the base 64 encoding beforehand so you can treat the authorization header as entirely plaintext
💯 1
w
Watz
01/27/2021, 7:16 AM
"Only certain SuiteScript 2.x APIs can reference secrets", sounds like it would work similarly as other secrets fields and certificates. I hope not.
As in not available for use in custom/third party modules.