Odd one that I can't figure out ... got a try/catc...
# suitescriptd
Daryl K
09/01/2020, 7:47 AMOdd one that I can't figure out ... got a try/catch in a map reduce script (that's running for ~5 minutes) and I can't print the error from the catch
Daryl K
09/01/2020, 7:48 AM Copy code
log.error({
title: "map",
details: JSON.stringify({
'errObj.id': errObj.id,
'errObj.cause': errObj.cause,
'errObj.type': errObj.type,
'errObj.message': errObj.message,
'typeof(errObj)': typeof(errObj)
})
});Daryl K
09/01/2020, 7:49 AMreturns
Copy code
{
"typeof(errObj)": "object"
}p
Peter Bertelsen
09/01/2020, 8:07 AMlog.error('Error on: ' + context.key, error)
Peter Bertelsen
09/01/2020, 8:14 AMthe log module will always run its own stringify function, so there should be no need to do it like that.
d
Daryl K
09/01/2020, 9:06 AMyeah I tried logging it directly, I get
{}Daryl K
09/01/2020, 9:06 AMsame as if I try
JSON.stringify(errObj)n
NElliott
09/01/2020, 11:01 AMwhere is errObj being initialised , is it the object in the catch i.e. catch(errObj)?
Have you tried logging out errors in the summarise section?
Copy code
summary.mapSummary.errors.iterator().each(function(code, message) {
log.error({title:'Map Error : ' + code, details:message});
});d
Daryl K
09/01/2020, 11:42 AMyeah it's the error object from a try catch
p
Peter Bertelsen
09/01/2020, 11:48 AMThis works in SS 2.0
try running a basic script like this:
try {
console.log('console is not defined');
} catch (error) {
log.error(context.key, error);
}
if that does not return an error message, there might be something wrong in the getInputData, and you can log that error in the summary
b
battk
09/01/2020, 1:10 PMyour logging suggests that the error is an empty object, or an object with no keys on the current object
battk
09/01/2020, 1:11 PMyou can try using Object.keys to see if there is anything on the object
battk
09/01/2020, 1:12 PMyou can also try Object.getOwnPropertyNames, which will include non-enumerable keys
battk
09/01/2020, 1:12 PM2.1 used to throw something similar, so use 2.0 if you happen to be using 2.1
d
Daryl K
09/01/2020, 1:54 PMyeah I was using 2.1 ... thanks for the help 🙂
b
battk
09/01/2020, 2:02 PM@Ashwin K. is generally interested in hearing about 2.1 related errors, so send him details about your script
👍 1
14 Views