I don't believe that second `push()` is behaving t...
# suitescripte
erictgrubaugh
02/01/2019, 6:52 PMI don't believe that second
push()t
Tyler
02/01/2019, 6:54 PMHey Eric, how do you mean?
e
erictgrubaugh
02/01/2019, 7:00 PMOh, nvm, I've never used it like that; didn't realize
pusherictgrubaugh
02/01/2019, 7:03 PMNot sure what the rest of your filters are, but I would expect the whole filter to look something like
Copy code
var filters = [
["isinactive", "isnot", true], "AND", // just an example to illustrate grouping
[ // group the color filters together
["item", "contains", "blue"], "OR",
["item", "contains", "red"]
]
]t
Tyler
02/01/2019, 7:04 PMNo worries 🙂 I think I figured out how I can make this happen: I have to say something like filterExpression.push("[itemid, startswith, id], and, [itemid, contains, color], or") for each of the colors in the array, and then do some conditionals if it's the last element etc.etc.
Tyler
02/01/2019, 7:04 PMI tried it the way you have it in your code, but the issue was it would stop looking at the "startswith" part after the first or and start returning items that just had that color in the name
e
erictgrubaugh
02/01/2019, 7:10 PMWhat type of search?
t
Tyler
02/01/2019, 7:15 PMIt's an Item Saved Search
e
erictgrubaugh
02/01/2019, 7:16 PMWould expect the filter name to be
itemiditemt
Tyler
02/01/2019, 7:25 PMYeah, that's my fault - I was just typing it up real quick and put item instead but the actual code does have itemid. I'm wondering if I search by "name" instead of "itemid" if it would make a difference.