I really wish they'd release "secondary" release n...
# releases
r
I really wish they'd release "secondary" release notes where they list out all the little quality of life improvements they slip into each release, but don't ever announce because they're not "sexy." Those types of things are usually the ones I find most useful. Examples: ability to link an imported bill to a PO, being able to use account # to import JEs, etc. Those things are great for a lot of people, but I don't think were ever listed anywhere, I just kind of stumbled onto them.
k
“ability to link an imported bill to a PO” - really??? I missed that one!!! This feature will change lives! LOL
where did you “stumble” into this gold, @RJMNS?
r
@Karina it's a new mappable field that's in the CSV mapping (below). Caveats/limitations: 1. It's a "header" only thing, ie there's no partial billing. In that field you select PO(s) you want to bill and it will attach the imported bill to that PO and bill it a. If you want to create one bill for multiple POs, you just separate the PO Int IDs by your selected delimiter b. Though I've never tried it if you have an already partially billed PO and you select that one in that field. I don't know if it will bill the rest or error out. I suspect it will bill the rest c. But you definitely can't choose certain lines of the PO you want to bill 2. Because it's header only, you can't set/modify any values on the line items; it just brings over all the lines of the PO onto the bill I think it's basically using the same functionality as the Transactions>Payables>Bill Purchase Orders page. I think you have to have Advanced Receiving or some non-basic inventory function for that screen to be available. I don't know if you can do this if you just have "standard" inventory functionality. I no longer have access to multiple NS accounts to check. Long story short, it's been really useful for us, but I can see where the limitations might not make it useful for others.
k
Thank you!!! this is great. Before that it is a script only, expensive for clients! My purpose here is only for data migration, and it should do!
👍 1