This site was built to compliment the existing NetSuite Professionals Slack Community by adding a means for members to easily find answers to common questions and to create a searchable database of those questions and answers.

NetSuite Professionals

In a SS1.0 Suitelet, why would `request.getAllHeaders()` give only empty values? I don't have this issue in an equivalent SS2.x script with `context.request.headers`. Both suitelets have an identical deployment (available without login, execute as administrator, audience all roles).

Am I doing something wrong, or is this some known issue?
```var headers = JSON.stringify(request.getAllHeaders());
nlapiLogExecution('Debug', 'Test Suitelet', 'Headers: ' + headers);
response.setContentType('JSON');
response.write(headers);```

image.png

`getAllHeaders()` seems to return a `string[]` with all the header keys, no header values. I tested in the console (though it was an `nlobjResponse` rather than `nlobjRequest`) and also indicated by <https://www.netsuiterp.com/2018/09/using-nlobjresponse-getallheaders-and.html|this post>.

So if that's the case, you'll want to skip `stringify` and instead iterate over the list and use `request.getHeader(headers[i])` to build your map

The 1.0 documentation states it returns an associative array (i.e. an Object), but that doesn't actually seem to be the case

Yeah, tested in a proper 1.0 Suitelet.
```  for (var h in request.getAllHeaders()) {
    nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'header=', h);
  }```
yields

Ah, brilliant! :slightly_smiling_face: Thanks <@U29PVMVAR>, that's really helpful. It wasn't clear to me what the associative array was exactly. I'm still not clear how it's not just an object with properties, because you get the values out of it just that way (they are in there!).
This works:
```var allHeaders = request.getAllHeaders(), headersObj = {};

for (var header in allHeaders) {
    headersObj[header] = allHeaders[header];
}
response.setContentType('JSON');
response.write(JSON.stringify(headersObj));```
Initially used request.getHeader(), but it's not necessary.

huh that's very odd; I would not expect that to work, but I'm glad it does