Has anyone spent much time creating customer payments via suitescript? I'm doing it in the console as a test and every time I set the expense account it errors out with

code: 'RangeError', details: 'Maximum call stack size exceeded'

, in the UI I can confirm there should only be like 5 journal entries populating (pre-setting currency)

Please post your code - it sounds like you're stuck in a loop with no exit

I've tried it two ways, here's some quick pseudo code. I'm doing it in the browser console so it's this simple-

// require record, set to var record
// transform customer to customer payment (dynamic) - rec = record.transform({ fromType: 'customer', toType: 'customerpayment', fromId: customerId })
// set currency - rec.setText('currency', 'Euro')
// set expense account - rec.setText('aracct', arAccount)

or

// require record
// rec = record.create({ type: 'custoemrpayment' })
// rec.setText('customer', customerName)
// rec.setText('currency', 'Euro')
// rec.setText('aracct', arAccount)

Are you doing anything recursive?

nope that's literally it

Thank you for sharing your code. Your argument(s) for setText are incorrect - please see the documentation here.

Hmm interesting, I've never had to use that syntax before with setText but i'll certainly give it a shot, thank you! I wonder if

ignoreFieldChange

will help

Ah, do you have some client script on the page with fieldChanged functions that are getting caught in a loop?

Sorry for the delay was having lunch. That's a good idea about perhaps some sort of workflow or something running. Yes OneWorld w/ multiple subsidiaries. Working with the default subsidiary though

Is that account only for one subsidiary? Are you confident that your default subsidiary is the one selected for the new created transformed record, or should you set it first before you set the AR account? When you create this type of transaction in the UI and update that AR field, can you see anything else on the page change in response?

It's multi-subsidiary (though only has associated records under one, we just default them to all). Just confirmed it is set on transform. Unfortunately even suspending all workflows and un-deploying all user event scripts still the same issue

Are you sure it's not some other script or workflow in the event chain? I feel like it has to be.

Not that I can find, I went to the Scripted Record and unchecked Deployed on all scripts and set all workflows to Suspended. About to jump on a zoom with netsuite support

Let us know how it turns out!

support encountered the same issue even when they built a small script to test themselves from their side (vs my testing in the browser console) so they're looking into it and hopefully I'll hear back tomorrow

Disappointingly they said that after reviewing internally they 'don't recommend' i make a record in the console and only do it via full script records. Very frustrating since I'm only trying to set up a single record in the console so i can use it for researching what I have to do.

That just means your support rep doesn't know what they're talking about. lol Using the console and writing a client script are using the very same APIs...

Yep

Did you clear your cache?

Upon consulting this case internally and testing it within the internal QA environment, we do not recommend testing within the console log. 

Ideally, use one of the SuiteScripts for testing such as Suitelet to test whether the code is working as intended or not.

I'll have to waste time making a script that fails now

You might have an old version of a client script you / someone was working on that was cached by the browser.

I'm not using a client script or anything. Just literally loading up my record module, creating a blank customer payment, and trying to assign a customer to it

I would try it. Whenever something truly wacky happens I clear my cache. It's fixed countless issues on the client side

Fair enough, but I just tried in incognito with same issue-

require (['N/record'])
=> ...
record = require ('N/record')
=> {Event: {…}, create: ƒ, load: ƒ, copy: ƒ, transform: ƒ, …}
rec = record.create({ type: 'customerpayment', isDynamic: true })
=> DynamicRecord {getMacros: ƒ, getMacro: ƒ, executeMacro: ƒ, …}
rec.setValue('customer', 27623)
=> N.js?NS_VER=2023.1&minver=17&buildver=31238:2444 Uncaught nlobjError {id: null, code: 'RangeError', details: 'Maximum call stack size exceeded', stacktrace: "stacktrace: function nlobjError(code, error, suppr…rguments: {'undefined','aracct','undefined',-1}\n\n", suppressnotification: false, …}

If that doesn't work, try using

setValue

instead of

setText

. Set text is wonky. I never use it.

i did use setValue there