Not liking the trend of people reading a question and then posting a ChatGPT answer. The answers aren't always often correct. It takes away from the community knowledge that we all are here to share, contribute, and learn from. It fills up responses with not only questionable info, but with discussion of ChatGPT instead of the issue. If someone thinks ChatGPT will provide a good answer, they should write, "Have you tried ChatGPT?" and let the person explore on their own. I'm not saying ChatGPT is the devil. But at the end of the day it might lead us to a path, but it can't walk it for us. I use it to get ideas on how something could be built, not to replace my knowledge of our systems or understand our particular customizations and processes. /rant -over -forNow

I think you make valid points. I have used chatGPT regularly for a while now and it's mostly useful to me. However if you take it's answer at face value, particularly with SuiteScript, you're likely to hit issues. Also, If you're on here asking for help and not experienced with NS / SuiteScript you're unlikely to appreciate how it's gone subtly off piste when someone pastes in a half baked chatGPT response. Using chatGPT should definitely come with a "buyer beware" warning. (if it doesn't already)

I think the frustrating thing is that the goal is to give correct answers to people's questions. Even if AI were helpful overall, you should still be doing some basic QA. They're just cosigning a bunch of non-sense without having any idea if it's correct.